But that has also allowed the company to get away with ignoring the mini, because they’re currently two separate products. Apple has been fairly responsible with iMac updates in recent years, introducing faster models shortly after appropriate chips became available. No longer would a consumer interested in a desktop Mac have to waffle between the iMac and mini they’d now be directed explicitly to “iMac,” and from there the choice of model and capabilities may not weigh so heavily.Īnother potential benefit of such a move could be more rapid updates. It’s true that morphing the mini into a headless iMac only shuffles the position of the same pieces on the board, but the psychological difference would definitely be felt. The mini clearly blurs the line between between “pro” and “consumer,” and while that’s a good thing for those who own and love their minis, it may not be so good for new customers trying to choose which Mac to buy.Ī simplified matrix with four primary products would make the buying decision for new customers easier. But I’ve met people who use minis for video editing, scientific research, and, of course, servers. Now, it’s true that these lines aren’t impenetrable - pros can and do find great use with the iMac and Air, and average consumers do buy the MacBook Pro in great numbers - but these divisions form an excellent starting point for explaining Apple’s product offerings to new consumers.īut where does the Mac mini fit in that matrix? Personally, I use a mini connected to the living room television to run media apps like Plex, clearly a “consumer” level of usage.
#Servetome mac portable
Once again dismissing the non-Retina MacBook Pro, Apple offers a pro desktop (the Mac Pro), a pro portable (the MacBook Pro with Retina Display), and a consumer desktop (the iMac), accompanied by a consumer laptop (the MacBook Air).
![servetome mac servetome mac](https://cdn.lo4d.com/t/icon/128/servetome.png)
Today, however, that original product matrix is no longer so simple.